Obviously, we've all been privy to the recent events in Pennsylvania. The debate is on strong, but our side seems to be in the lead. Course, being in the lead in a court case is a bit like asking chess players "who's winning?" There is no ahead or behind, only win or loose in the end. But evidence that "Intelligent Design" is creationism in disguise, seems to abound, whereas the only credible witness called on by the defense was a crackpot scientist, who should be fired the minute he gets back to the university from which he breeds his insanity.
There is another tactic being tried for the side of Science. Check this. It does make sense. I wouldn't want my text book in the same classroom as "Of Pandas And People." That joke of a book. My God. Have you taken a look at the first chapter? The reviews at Amazon say it well, what kind of shit is this?
Thanks to General Richard for the Copyrighted Materials article.